Pharyngeal Electrical Stimulation for Treatment of Dysphagia
Acute stroke is complicated by oropharyngeal dysphagia in 50% of patients; of these, up to 40% remain dysphagic a year later.1 Dysphagia is complicated by aspiration, pneumonia, and malnutrition,2 and patients need enteral feeding through a nasogastric tube or percutaneous endoscopically introduced gastrostomy tube, which often requires long-term institutional care.3 Although dysphagia may be treated using several physical and behavioral techniques, there are no definitive treatments.4
Human swallowing has bilateral representation in the cerebral hemispheres with a dominant cortex (unrelated to handedness).5 Dysphagia often follows a stroke that affects the dominant swallowing cortex, which is then exacerbated in recurrent strokes. Swallowing is dependent on afferent feedback via bulbar cranial nerves innervating the pharynx, and increased sensory input from the pharynx can drive long-term beneficial changes in the cortical control of swallowing6 with functionally relevant reorganization of the swallowing cortex.6,7
During development of pharyngeal electric stimulation (PES), a study in healthy volunteers8,9 suggested that PES should be delivered at 5 Hz for 10 minutes with an electric current of threshold plus 75% of the difference between threshold and tolerance levels, a paradigm that produced the largest effect on brain excitability.8,10 Using this approach in patients with subacute stroke in a randomized dose-comparison trial, PES reduced radiological aspiration, manifest as a reduction in penetration aspiration score (PAS).9 Similarly, PES reduced clinical dysphagia (assessed using the dysphagia severity rating scale [DSRS]) and length of stay in hospital in patients with dysphagia post stroke in a sham-controlled parallel-group phase II trial.9 In a further multicentre phase II randomized sham-controlled trial, PES was associated with nonsignificant tendencies to reduced clinical dysphagia and shorter length of stay in hospital.11 An individual patient data meta-analysis of these 3 trials found that PES significantly reduced aspiration (PAS) and dysphagia (DSRS) and was safe and well tolerated.12 Here, we present the results of a large, randomized, sham-controlled phase III trial of PES in patients with subacute poststroke dysphagia.